‘Adventurous’ Woman Needed as Surrogate for Neanderthal Baby
Are you an adventurous human woman? Adventurous enough to be a surrogate mother for the first Neanderthal baby to be born in 30,000 years?
Harvard geneticist George Church recently told Der Spiegel he’s close to developing the necessary technology to clone a Neanderthal, at which point all he’d need is an “adventurous human woman” — einen abenteuerlustigen weiblichen Menschen — to act as a surrogate mother.
It’s not out of the question at all. As MIT Technology Review’s Susan Young points out, scientists cloned an extinct subspecies of ibex in 2009. It died immediately, sure. But they still cloned it.
What would that entail? According to a 2008 study of a Neanderthal infant skeleton (from which the above image is taken), “the head of the Neanderthal newborn was somewhat longer than that of a human newborn because of its relatively robust face,” and Neanderthal women generally had a wider birth canal than human women. Neanderthal birth was simpler than human birth, because Neanderthal infants didn’t have to rotate to get to the birth canal, but otherwise the processes were very similar. (Even so, I imagine all but the most adventurous of human women would opt for a C-section in this case.)
Once the baby’s out, though, you’re in good shape — Neanderthal babies are thought to have grown much more quickly than their human counterparts. And Church seems to think that there’ll be a Neanderthal craze, as he told Bloomberg Businessweek last year:



“We have lots of Neanderthal parts around the lab. We are creating Neanderthal cells. Let’s say someone has a healthy, normal Neanderthal baby. Well, then, everyone will want to have a Neanderthal kid. Were they superstrong or supersmart? Who knows? But there’s one way to find out.”



[Der Spiegel via MIT Technology Review]

‘Adventurous’ Woman Needed as Surrogate for Neanderthal Baby

Are you an adventurous human woman? Adventurous enough to be a surrogate mother for the first Neanderthal baby to be born in 30,000 years?

Harvard geneticist George Church recently told Der Spiegel he’s close to developing the necessary technology to clone a Neanderthal, at which point all he’d need is an “adventurous human woman” — einen abenteuerlustigen weiblichen Menschen — to act as a surrogate mother.

It’s not out of the question at all. As MIT Technology Review’s Susan Young points out, scientists cloned an extinct subspecies of ibex in 2009. It died immediately, sure. But they still cloned it.

What would that entail? According to a 2008 study of a Neanderthal infant skeleton (from which the above image is taken), “the head of the Neanderthal newborn was somewhat longer than that of a human newborn because of its relatively robust face,” and Neanderthal women generally had a wider birth canal than human women. Neanderthal birth was simpler than human birth, because Neanderthal infants didn’t have to rotate to get to the birth canal, but otherwise the processes were very similar. (Even so, I imagine all but the most adventurous of human women would opt for a C-section in this case.)

Once the baby’s out, though, you’re in good shape — Neanderthal babies are thought to have grown much more quickly than their human counterparts. And Church seems to think that there’ll be a Neanderthal craze, as he told Bloomberg Businessweek last year:

“We have lots of Neanderthal parts around the lab. We are creating Neanderthal cells. Let’s say someone has a healthy, normal Neanderthal baby. Well, then, everyone will want to have a Neanderthal kid. Were they superstrong or supersmart? Who knows? But there’s one way to find out.”

[Der Spiegel via MIT Technology Review]

  1. cherriesndlove reblogged this from alexandrathealright
  2. tastes-like-feet reblogged this from heartlikeahandgrenade
  3. ziroen reblogged this from miakosamuio
  4. indigoserenade reblogged this from thebrockway
  5. thisisabattleground-901 reblogged this from miakosamuio
  6. demented-wholockian-ravenpuff reblogged this from miakosamuio
  7. sheerdumbluck reblogged this from miakosamuio
  8. avadakedavrathathoe reblogged this from miakosamuio
  9. miakosamuio reblogged this from gingerbreadwizard
  10. heartlikeahandgrenade reblogged this from itsvondell
  11. teashop-for-the-soul reblogged this from distally
  12. distally reblogged this from geofframsay
  13. youknowmyname-notmyblog reblogged this from geofframsay
  14. geofframsay reblogged this from brookeisthebestest
  15. brookeisthebestest reblogged this from itsvondell
  16. nicealyssum reblogged this from faunylawny
  17. whatever-lion reblogged this from lupercos and added:
    well, they didn’t even bother to admit that Neanderthals were in fact human… so…
  18. pablohonie reblogged this from itsvondell and added:
    So basically there are all these laws and ethical debates that don’t allow us to clone homo sapiens sapiens babies...
  19. intimacyofinadequacy reblogged this from moonmolt and added:
    I am a healthy adventurous woman lets do this
  20. techieturtle reblogged this from sightsandsounds-papertowns
  21. pigeonsdofly reblogged this from itsvondell
  22. cooshmoosh reblogged this from itsvondell
  23. the-one-that-does-that-thing reblogged this from itsvondell
  24. jenkisreeeaaal reblogged this from itsvondell and added:
    ‘were they super smart? we don’t know’ no they werent, they were neanderthals.
  25. sad-eyed-lady-of-the-low-lands reblogged this from iamhattie
  26. iriatriss reblogged this from moonmolt
  27. jesslop reblogged this from itsvondell
  28. ubersociallyinept reblogged this from actual-fish
  29. iamhattie reblogged this from itsvondell
  30. iammog reblogged this from itsvondell
  31. adoedem reblogged this from itsvondell
  32. castlebrennenburg reblogged this from itsvondell
  33. jaglavak reblogged this from beautifulhorsemeat
842 Tiny Hand